Tulane Green Wave at Army Black Knights college football matchup
- Kickoff
- Sat, Oct 10
- 12:00 PM EDT
- Venue
- Army home
- Michie Stadium
- Captured market
- Line not posted
- No verified spread
- Player model
- 13 players
- preseason · cfb-fantasy-quantile-2026.1
Tulane visits Army in Week 6.
Tulane travels to Army at Michie Stadium. No sourced spread is attached to this game yet, so the page does not infer a favorite.
The published player model covers 13 featured skill players in this matchup. Its highest median fantasy forecasts belong to Kadin Semonza (TULN), Cale Hellums (ARMY), and Jamauri McClure (TULN).
Market pending
There is no verified spread for this matchup in the committed snapshot.
Player projection coverage
13 player distributions are available, led by Kadin Semonza (TULN).
Venue context
Army is the designated home team at Michie Stadium.
cfb-fantasy-quantile-2026.1 · preseason
As of 2026-08-13T21:35:05+00:00No favorite inferred
context onlyPreseason model
As of 2026-08-13T21:35:05+00:00Unit ledger
Every bar rewards the better low-number rank, while exact values stay visible for both teams.
Unit edges from the 2025 charting
Offense units paired against the defense units they will face, from snap-weighted 2025 PFF grades, national ranks, and returning-snap shares. Historical form, never a game prediction.
Each offense unit paired against the defense unit it will actually face, using 2025 snap-weighted PFF grades and national ranks, with returning-snap caveats where an edge rests on departed players. Measured history, not a game prediction.
Tulane pass protection vs Army pass rush
Tulane's pass protection graded 71.5 in 2025 (25th of 136); Army's pass rush graded 61.7 (117th). On 2025 form that is a clear edge for Tulane's pass protection.
Army pass protection vs Tulane pass rush
Army's pass protection graded 60.2 in 2025 (104th of 136); Tulane's pass rush graded 70.0 (15th). On 2025 form that is a clear edge for Tulane's pass rush.
Tulane receiving corps vs Army coverage
Tulane's receiving corps graded 64.0 in 2025 (78th of 136); Army's coverage graded 60.3 (109th). On 2025 form that is a modest edge for Tulane's receiving corps.
Army receiving corps vs Tulane coverage
Army's receiving corps graded 66.2 in 2025 (41st of 136); Tulane's coverage graded 62.9 (81st). On 2025 form that is a clear edge for Army's receiving corps.
Tulane rush offense vs Army run defense
Tulane's rush offense graded 72.6 in 2025 (99th of 136); Army's run defense graded 64.3 (107th). On 2025 form this pairing is effectively a push.
Army rush offense vs Tulane run defense
Army's rush offense graded 69.7 in 2025 (121st of 136); Tulane's run defense graded 66.1 (78th). On 2025 form that is a clear edge for Tulane's run defense.
Where the player model concentrates
The two highest median model players for each side. Context-only prior and baseline rows are excluded.
League projected stat lines
Means and 20th–80th percentile ranges for every published model player; missing stats stay missing.
Tulane
9 League projections| Player | Pos | Fantasy pts | Pass yds | Rush yds | Receptions | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kadin SemonzaVOLATILE · Tier 3 | QB | 17.75.9–26.4 | 224142–297 | — | — | — |
| Jamauri McClurebalanced · Tier 6 | RB | 12.44.2–19.7 | — | 6521–99 | — | — |
| Anthony Brown-StephensHIGH CEILING · Tier 5 | WR | 9.23.5–14.6 | — | — | 3.41.1–5.0 | 4513–65 |
| Zeon Chriss-GremillionELITE · Tier 5 | QB | 9.21.5–15.4 | — | 270–45 | — | — |
| Johnnie Danielsbalanced · Tier 6 | RB | 8.31.9–13.6 | — | — | — | — |
| Ty ThompsonHIGH CEILING · Tier 6 | TE | 7.61.4–12.8 | — | 314–50 | — | — |
| Zycarl Lewis Jr.VOLATILE · Tier 5 | WR | 6.82.0–10.6 | — | — | 2.61.0–4.0 | 349–49 |
| Garrett MmahatHIGH CEILING · Tier 5 | WR | 6.91.8–10.6 | — | — | 2.61.0–4.1 | 328–43 |
| Dawson JohnsonELITE · Tier 6 | TE | 6.01.7–10.1 | — | — | — | 287–42 |
Army
4 League projections| Player | Pos | Fantasy pts | Pass yds | Rush yds | Receptions | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cale HellumsELITE · Tier 3 | QB | 18.47.0–27.9 | — | 8534–119 | — | — |
| Brady Andersonbalanced · Tier 5 | WR | 8.72.6–13.7 | — | — | — | 4414–72 |
| Parker PoloskeySAFE FLOOR · Tier 6 | TE | 7.32.1–10.7 | — | — | — | 3610–57 |
| Jake RendinaHIGH CEILING · Tier 6 | RB | 6.91.1–10.9 | — | 304–49 | — | — |
Tulane
- Pass yds
- 224
- Rush yds
- 65
- Receptions
- 3.4
- Rec yds
- 45
- Rush yds
- 27
- Rush yds
- 31
- Receptions
- 2.6
- Rec yds
- 34
- Receptions
- 2.6
- Rec yds
- 32
- Rec yds
- 28
Army
- Rush yds
- 85
- Rec yds
- 44
- Rec yds
- 36
- Rush yds
- 30
The League does not publish a game-side, total, or moneyline prediction without a validated game-market model.
Generated Aug 13, 5:35 PM EDT · collegefootballdata · Player outcomes are ranges, not guarantees. No game-side, total, or moneyline prediction is inferred.
Props to compare after a line posts
Model ranges are not recommendations. No player-prop line or price is captured in this artifact.
| Player | Market | Projection | Median | 20th–80th | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kadin SemonzaQB · TULN | Passing yards | 223.9 | 213.8 | 141.7–297.4 | Shop the line |
| Cale HellumsQB · ARMY | Rushing yards | 85.2 | 70.1 | 33.7–118.5 | Shop the line |
| Jamauri McClureRB · TULN | Rushing yards | 65.2 | 56.0 | 21.1–99.1 | Shop the line |
| Brady AndersonWR · ARMY | Receiving yards | 44.4 | 35.5 | 13.8–72.0 | Shop the line |
| Anthony Brown-StephensWR · TULN | Receiving yards | 44.5 | 36.2 | 13.1–65.2 | Shop the line |
| Zeon Chriss-GremillionQB · TULN | Rushing yards | 27.3 | 19.5 | 0.0–45.3 | Shop the line |
Passing yards
- Projection
- 223.9
- Median
- 213.8
- 20th–80th
- 141.7–297.4
- Status
- Shop the line
No captured player-prop line. Compare the model range only after a market posts.
Rushing yards
- Projection
- 85.2
- Median
- 70.1
- 20th–80th
- 33.7–118.5
- Status
- Shop the line
No captured player-prop line. Compare the model range only after a market posts.
Rushing yards
- Projection
- 65.2
- Median
- 56.0
- 20th–80th
- 21.1–99.1
- Status
- Shop the line
No captured player-prop line. Compare the model range only after a market posts.
Receiving yards
- Projection
- 44.4
- Median
- 35.5
- 20th–80th
- 13.8–72.0
- Status
- Shop the line
No captured player-prop line. Compare the model range only after a market posts.
Receiving yards
- Projection
- 44.5
- Median
- 36.2
- 20th–80th
- 13.1–65.2
- Status
- Shop the line
No captured player-prop line. Compare the model range only after a market posts.
Rushing yards
- Projection
- 27.3
- Median
- 19.5
- 20th–80th
- 0.0–45.3
- Status
- Shop the line
No captured player-prop line. Compare the model range only after a market posts.
Methodology and data boundary
Schedule and venue facts come from the committed ESPN 2026 catalog. Spreads are dated market snapshots, prioritizing DraftKings where available. Player stat lines and fantasy ranges come only from the versioned weekly CFB quantile model; prior and baseline context do not enter this page. Missing data stays missing.
- Line snapshot
- No line
- Model update
- Aug 13, 5:35 PM EDT
- Game prediction
- Not validated